Error occured ! We are notified and will try and resolve this as soon as possible.
WARNING! [2] file_put_contents(/home/gelembjuk/domains/myeducationpath.com/app/../html/cache/memory/course_25_0_e086762d743c0218beb85ea6e1b456cae.txt): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory . Line 75 in file /home/gelembjuk/domains/myeducationpath.com/html/include/class.cache.php. Continue execution. 2702633; index.php; 3.136.22.184; GET; url=courses/25/applied-cryptography/review/2.htm&; ; Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com); ; Executon time: 0 MyEducationPath.com :: Review on course Applied Cryptography

Review of the course Applied Cryptography

Back to the course

Comparing the Coursera and Udacity Cryptography classes

by Bryan Pendleton

Over the spring, I worked my way through two online cryptography classes: 

Professor Dan Boneh's course, hosted at Coursera

Professor Dave Evans's course, hosted at Udacity

 

 Taking both classes was not a waste; the two presentations nicely complemented and reinforced each other, and in the end I felt that I learned a lot from each. 

 

 But there were both differences and similarities between the courses, which I found interesting. 

 

 Both formats are broadly the same: 

Both classes are, roughly, upper-division undergraduate classes in modern cryptography, covering roughly the same material

Both classes are presented as video lectures, in the style of allowing you to view the virtual whiteboard that the lecturer is drawing on, while listening to the lecture.

Both classes augment the video lectures with quizzes, homework assignments, additional reading, and forums for students to gather and discuss the material

 

 Some of the differences in the classes were mechanical: 

The videos for the Boneh class were generally 12-20 minutes in length, each, while the videos for the Evans class were generally 1-3 minutes in length, each

The slides and quizzes for the Boneh class were typeset, and were supplemented by a certain amount of free-hand annotation, while the slides and quizzes for the Evans class were presented entirely in free-hand

The classes present the material in a different order

Although the materials used largely similar notation, there were notational differences (e.g., Boneh uses the terminology "public key/secret key" and the letters "p" and "s", where Evans generally uses the terminology "public key/private key" and the letters "u" and "r")

 

..... read full post



Cancel and back to the course